Set the line for each category. Every title is measured against it. It is worked out and kept on this device, and shared with no one.
A review can be the exposure. In family view, anything over your line is named but not described, and you choose whether titles outside your rules are listed or hidden. This is a preference stored on this device: a speed bump for a curious reader, not a lock.
Three questions, then the catalogue ranked against your answers. These are the same five lines House Rules sets (a shorter way in, not a second set of rules), and nothing is saved to this device unless you ask for it at the end.
Tools worth pointing you to beyond this site, for study, teaching and other families' reviews. A curated list, not a review: nothing below carries a content record or a fit badge.
These are external sites BibleDo Lens does not control, review or endorse in full. Each is here for the reason stated beside it, not a blanket recommendation of everything the site or ministry publishes. Links open the site directly; nothing here is licensed, mirrored or altered by BibleDo Lens.
The content record and the criticism, side by side, for every title, measured against the lines your household states rather than a stranger's. This is a research prototype, and this page is the part worth reading before you trust the rest of it.
The two description axes stay out of the badge on purpose: whether households want to set dispositions at all is one of the questions this pilot exists to ask, and quietly ranking on them would answer it in the build instead of in the data.
Every entry is desk research, compiled from at least two cited public sources that are listed on its own Provenance tab. Nothing in this catalogue was viewed, played, read or listened to. The severities and the stance tags are editorial inferences drawn from documented facts, not observations, and they have not been checked against the works themselves. On 23 October 2026 every record was checked, claim by claim, against the sources it cites, and anything those sources did not support was corrected or removed; points that rest only on Common Sense Media were not re-checked, because its terms do not allow automated checking. Where a record's own sourcing is thin, the record says so.
Reviews are signed by a roster (Desk lens 1 through 4), and a lens reads identically on every record it signs. The lenses are declared editorial stances applied by an AI drafter. They are not people, no human reviewer has been assigned to any record yet, and there is no editorial staff. A stated lens is more trustworthy than a claimed neutrality nobody believes; an undisclosed drafter would be neither.
A review can itself be the exposure: the sentence describing what is over your line is the sentence you may not want read aloud. In family view the signal stays (the category, the severity, "above your line") and the description is withheld: the text is left out of the page entirely rather than hidden with styling, so view-source, find-in-page and a screen reader have nothing to find. Titles outside your rules can be shown, listed by name and reason only, or hidden. Hidden ones are always counted back to you, because a quietly shortened list is a false claim about the catalogue. It is a preference kept on this device: a speed bump for a curious reader, not a lock. Parent view is the default.
Commentary and description only. We never reproduce, redistribute or alter any work. That line is not a style choice; it is the one the law actually turns on. Each title's picture is its owner's own artwork (a poster, a cover, a channel's picture), kept as a small copy to show which title the review is about, and credited on the review; any owner can ask for theirs to come down. The reviews are free and need no account, no money changes what a review says, and we never collect information about your children. There is no community and no vote count, because there is no community yet.